Many patients prefer to return to the clinic for next-day pegfilgrastim administration
A patient survey evaluated preference for pegfilgrastim product administration and value of next-day visits1
Select demographics
Sex: 59% female, 41% male
Top 3 cancer types: breast (31%), NSCLC (16%), prostate (12%)
Full-time employed: 59%
Distance to clinic: 63% of patients live within 25 miles; 10% live within 50–100 miles; 3% live >100 miles
Note: Where appropriate, statistical differences between patient groups were tested at a 90%-95% CI.
Survey limitations: Retrospective survey; only one group had experience with both PFS and OBI devices. Subgroups were not matched with patient cancer types or chemotherapy treatments. Results reflect the opinion of patients and are not intended to be used as clinical support. Sponsored by Coherus BioSciences, Inc.1
CI = confidence interval; NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer; OOP = out-of-pocket; PFS = prefilled syringe; OBI = on-body injector.
Survey design1
- Online, double-blinded survey conducted in 275 adult patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy within the last 90 days
- Survey fielded 02/08/21–03/02/21
- 3 patient groups: Prefilled syringe (PFS) users, on-body injector (OBI) users, patients experienced with both PFS and OBI
Survey key objectives1
- Understand patient preference for pegfilgrastim administration and the value of next-day visits
- Determine desired level of patient involvement in their pegfilgrastim decision
- Understand impact of travel distance
- Evaluate the influence of OOP costs
Note: Where appropriate, statistical differences between patient groups were tested at a 90%-95% CI.
Survey limitations: Retrospective survey; only one group had experience with both PFS and OBI devices. Subgroups were not matched with patient cancer types or chemotherapy treatments. Results reflect the opinion of patients and are not intended to be used as clinical support. Sponsored by Coherus BioSciences, Inc.1
CI = confidence interval;
NSCLC = non-small cell lung cancer;
OOP = out-of-pocket;
PFS = prefilled syringe;
OBI = on-body injector.
SURVEY RESULTS
Next-day visits to the clinic may increase patient comfort
Among patients experienced with both PFS and OBI (n=56)1:
*Vs 60% of OBI users (n=106); significant at 90% CI. Percentages reflect patients strongly agreeing/agreeing with the statement “I prefer to come back to the office the next day to get my pegfilgrastim administered by my HCP.”
†Vs 73% OBI users (n=106); significant at 90% CI. Percentage reflects patients strongly agreeing/agreeing with the statement “I feel well monitored for side effects related to my cancer treatment if I come back to the office the day after chemotherapy for my pegfilgrastim injection.”
‡Vs 62% of OBI users; significant at 90% CI. Percentages reflect patients strongly agreeing/agreeing with the statement “I feel more at ease if my pegfilgrastim is administered in-person by my HCP.”
§Vs 62% of OBI users; significant at 95% CI. Percentages reflect patients strongly agreeing/agreeing with the statement “I believe the quality of my care increases if I come back to the office the day after chemotherapy for my pegfilgrastim injection.”
CI = confidence interval; OBI = on-body injector; PFS = prefilled syringe.
SURVEY RESULTS
A majority of patients are willing to travel, especially for the lowest-cost option
Of patients surveyed (n=275)1:
would prefer the lowest-cost pegfilgrastim product option
even if it means returning to the office the next day
prefer to be involved in choosing their pegfilgrastim product option
with their HCP*
- 92% of all patients are able to return the day after chemotherapy, if needed1
* Percentage reflects patients answering extremely/very involved to the following question: “If you were given a choice, how involved would you like to be choosing which pegfilgrastim you receive?”
RECOMMENDING THE APPROACH THAT’S RIGHT FOR YOUR PATIENTS
Some considerations for assessing patient preference for prefilled syringe (PFS) or on-body injector (OBI)
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) suggest pegfilgrastim use to support clinical outcomes during chemotherapy.†2
See the guidelinesUDENYCA® delivers the reliable outcomes you expect, but with 35% cost savings per dose vs Neulasta®.*3
Discover the value of UDENYCA®UDENYCA® was confirmed to be highly similar to Neulasta®, with no clinically meaningful differences.1,4,5
View proven biosimilarity* Based on wholesale acquisition cost (WAC). WAC does not necessarily reflect actual prices paid by consumers, pharmacies, or third-party payers. UDENYCA® WAC of $4175 per prefilled syringe vs Neulasta® WAC of $6417 per prefilled syringe.
†Other suggestions for therapy are included in the NCCN Guidelines®.
References: 1. Data on file. Coherus BioSciences, Inc.; 2021. 2. Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Hematopoietic Growth Factors V.1.2022. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2022. All rights reserved. Accessed September 30, 2022. To view the most recent and complete version of the guidelines, go online to NCCN.org. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way. 3. Data on file. Coherus BioSciences, Inc.; 2022. 4. UDENYCA® (pegfilgrastim-cbqv) package insert. Redwood City, CA: Coherus BioSciences, Inc.; 2021. 5. Neulasta® (pegfilgrastim) package insert. Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen Inc.; 2021.